This is not a lab coat vs. hoodie debate - it's basic shit!
If you're going to write about these concepts, please understand the difference.
I'll make this as simple as I can...
Eccentric: the lengthening of a muscle under load
Concentric: the shortening of a muscle under load
Isometric: muscle doesn't lengthen or shorten while under load.
The phase between eccentric and concentric is called the amortization phase. It can also be known as stretch shortening.
This is a basic overview. Very easy stuff to search.
I won't share the blog post I just read, but it's embarrassing to the profession. If you don't know the correct terminology just say "up" and "down" in reference to the movement you're talking about. Or, look the shit up. Or.... just don't say anything at all.
This is not a lab coat vs. hoodie debate - it's basic shit!
This isn't the first time (this week even) that I've seen very basic ideas like this misrepresented.
This isn't like people who disagree on sitting back or down on the squat or if you should arch or not. Those are valid discussions with experience and support on both sides. While I see how these arguments can confuse some, I think it's great to expose people to all sides.
This is basic movement knowledge that's been published as often as the definition of a "rep" and a "set."
If the industry is only as good as the weakest link, then we need to do a better job of what we are teaching and how easy it is to understand. Maybe we are not spending enough time on content for those who are new to the field.
I'm positive that these concepts are presented in 1,000 or more certifications, but since we convinced everyone certifications are worthless, many do not take any of them.
This is a case of exactly why certifications exist. To teach the bottom line basic shit to do the minimal amount required to train someone.
1 Comment